Law of Rathore
Mohitoz’ Law #238
(Contributed by Ranajit Mukherjee)
If you have too much cheek, someone will surely puncture it someday!
Mohitoz’ Law #238
(Contributed by Ranajit Mukherjee)
If you have too much cheek, someone will surely puncture it someday!
Mohitoz’ Law #237
The vacuum cleaner outside your room will make a mumble-jumble in a conference call even more difficult to decipher.
Mohitoz’ Law #235
(Inspired by Rahul)
A heavy Sunday lunch, followed by a long-awaited nap, will be interrupted by the doorbell rung by an inconsequential vendor peddling unimportant wares.
Mohitoz’ Law #234
(Inspired by the other Hira)
Despite popular demand, no stall will stock a copy of Facebook.
Mohitoz’ Law #233
The eternal triangle is always right-tangled.
Mohitoz’ Law #232
(Inspired by Arti )
When you reach the station right on time, the train will be at the wrong platform.
Mohitoz’ Law #231
(Inspired by Kiruba)
If you get a seat with ample legroom, an oversized co-passenger will ensure you don’t get enough of the shared armrest.
looks like u had a rough experience ..
Mohitoz’ Law #230
(Contributed by Venu)
Whichever be the state, there will be least one sardar player in its hockey team.
Mohitoz’ Law #229
(Contributed by Jyoti)
No matter how much you push the envelope, it’ll still be stationery.
Mohitoz’ Law #228
Every bowler bites off more than he can chew.
Mohitoz’ Law #227
The darker the cloud, the more silver there is in the lining.
Wow!! I loved this one!
Mohitoz’ Law #225
Life is a Cabernet.
this was an amazing thing she did………… this brought back the memories of the incident when she took a stand against the D company case……….she’s a brave heart
Dude, day in and day out these stupid one-liners is all that you can conjure ? Get a life and try some variety for God’s sake !
Ha ha ha!! Funny that the “Wellwisher” comes back again and again day in and day out for these stupid one-liners!! Who is forcing him/her?
Mohitoz’ Law #222
The first Indian on the moon doesn’t have to be an astronaut.
witty law
and now they want one named after big B too… ya one doesnt have to an astronaut
Every Republic Day, India finds itself caught at the crossroads of celebration and self-crucification.
This year’s been no different: while we’re trying to say that the world’s largest republic is still sexy at sixty, we’re also asking whether we’ve been honest to the very idea of being the republic our founding fathers wanted us to be. All in the same page of the broadsheets and in the same capsules of prime-time news. Almost predictably, the same opinion-makers appear, by turn, to be questioned by M/s Roy, Chandra, Dutt, Goswami and Sardesai.
They say the same thing but with shades of wit and vitriol that vary depending on the character of the TV channel they’re on. Split screen. Split persona.
The question, however, is not what we’ve achieved or haven’t achieved. That’s a debate done to death.
The dilemma I face is of a republic that’s at odds with the Internet.
Internet? Now, where did that come from, you ask! He’s off his clicker – or whatever they call the old rocker these days, you mutter!
But, here’s where I come from.
On a Tuesday, last week, almost 25% of advertising and marketing professionals from a range of industries and cities, in their early-mid 30s couldn’t recognise the Twitter logo. This is not hearsay but the truth: I ran the poll as part of the Advanced Program in Digital Marketing I run at NIIT Imperia which the IAMAI certifies. It amazed me at first, but then I consoled myself saying these 70 people were here to learn because they did not know. Simple.
Cut to Friday. The venue is The Shri Ram School at Vasant Vihar. The audience: approximately100 students of class 5 – age 10 or 11 years old – and a few of their teachers. Unlike the Tuesday session, my mandate here is exactly the opposite: dissuade these children from Facebook, etc and caution them of the perils of the Internet.
(If I go schizophrenic someday, you’ll know why.)
Surprise, surprise: all of the kids recognise the Twitter logo! They’re not on it – not yet anyway – but they know. (A dozen of them, however, did admit to being on Facebook and to having fudged their ages to bypass the site’s rules.)
Does this mean that people who should know a brand like Twitter don’t and those who needn’t, do?
Does it mean that obsolescence will hit this generation harder and faster? I’d like to go back to another batch of Class 5 next year and see if they’re already on Twitter.
Or does it mean that digitally-savvy kids will be self-taught and courses like the one we now run will be redundant?
You’ll say that I state the obvious. Which may be true, but parts of a nation are gearing up to show off their military might tomorrow morning and others are cursing this extravaganza that closed the foggy airspace over Delhi for days, thus delaying their delayed flights even further. Others are wondering how a former Pakistani Air Force Chief could find his way into a Government-sponsored ad while yet others are scratching their heads trying to calculate the cost of those ads and what they could’ve fetched the girl child who was meant to benefit that day (if not every day).
I am reminded of the 1999-remake of Inherit the Wind (the Jack Lemmon & George C Scott version) where Matthew Brady says: “ I do not think about things I do not think about.”
Instead, I tell myself, that there is a power up there somewhere who knows what He’s doing in collaboration with Darwin himself.
And, hopefully in our own way, we will all evolve. Eventually.
Agree on this bit –
“Digitally-savvy kids will be self-taught and courses like the one we now run will be redundant?”
- we would need to find excuses to continue to interact with them to learn instead of try and teach them
as i mentioned earlier on ur facebook post get into their tutelage to understand how they are and will consume digital media
Mohitoz’ Law #221
Darwin was wrong: man is still an ape.
Mohitoz’ Law #220
A good dentist will swear to pull a lawyer’s tooth, the whole tooth and nothing but the tooth.
Mohitoz’ Law #219
Watching TV is dangerous; carrying explosives is not.
Freida Kahlo 7:38 pm on February 7, 2010 Permalink